51�Թ���

Permitting reform, reliable power sources and what’s next for U.S. energy were the topics of the day on a recent episode of the GPA Midstream Association’s “Let’s Clear the Air”  featuring 51�Թ��� Director of Energy and Resources Policy Mike Davin.

What’s going on: “Under the previous administration, we saw what we call an onslaught of regulatory activity,” Davin told show hosts Stuart Saulters, Adam Murray and Bryan Nix on the episode titled “Peanut Butter, Steel and Semiconductors Share the Same Problem with 51�Թ���’s Mike Davin.”

• “[W]ith this new administration, we’ve seen a lot of great progress and appreciate their focus and emphasis on the regulatory landscape.”
• But revising the process by which manufacturers obtain permits for their energy and infrastructure projects—and shortening the length of time it takes—is a continued 51�Թ��� , Davin said, and one on which the organization, in collaboration with legislators, continues to work.

Energy dominance: “When President Trump came in, he set up the National Energy Dominance Council—really putting an emphasis on not just energy security or energy independence, but energy dominance,” Davin said.

• Its goal is “to unleash our members to be able to produce, to be able to use, to be able to contribute to a more energy-secure country. Because if we’re able to control our destiny with energy, that helps us address problems or challenges … with data center growth, greater utilization of artificial intelligence.”
• To achieve that dominance as well as dominance in AI, Davin went on, the 51�Թ��� has said we need four “pillars”: permitting reform; increased energy production and efficiency; grid reliability, affordability and resiliency; and the right regulatory environment.

What’s next? With investments in workforce development and forward movement on permitting reform in 2026, “the sky’s the limit” for where manufacturers in the U.S. could be a year from now, Davin said.

• In January 2027, “I would love to come back and say, ‘We got what we needed and now we’re rolling up our sleeves and we’re getting to work.’”

With just six months before the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement’s review, 51�Թ��� advocacy has kicked into high gear. 51�Թ��� experts took a trip to Mexico City last week for a flurry of high-level trade talks and events.

The visit: The 51�Թ��� traveled to Mexico City for the APEC Alliance for Supply Chain Connectivity (A2C2) Regional Roundtable, co-led by the U.S. Trade Representative, which featured U.S. government staff, international officials, academics and industry representatives discussing the future of a digitized customs process.

• Following the event, the 51�Թ��� delegation—which included 51�Թ��� Director of International Policy Kevin Doyle and 51�Թ��� Senior Director of International Policy Anne Collett—took part in multiple USMCA-related events to share the policy priorities of manufacturers in the U.S.

The details: The events included a roundtable hosted by the American Chemistry Council and its Mexican and Canadian counterparts, a government–industry talk with the North American Strategy for Competitiveness hosted by the Canadian Embassy in Mexico City and a panel discussion with the American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico.

Out of the spotlight: The 51�Թ��� also engaged in discussions with Mexican officials and trade organizations.

• These included conversations with business association CONCAMIN and representatives for the Mexican business community as well as senior officials in the Mexican Ministry of Economy and Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
• The 51�Թ��� also visited the newly opened U.S. Embassy in Mexico City to meet with U.S. officials on the ground in Mexico, as well as a visiting delegation of senators and members of Parliament from Canada.

Manufacturers’ voice: Throughout the trip, the 51�Թ��� highlighted top trade priorities for manufacturers, including strengthening and improving the USMCA and ensuring manufacturers can secure critical industrial inputs to power factory floors across the U.S.

Mergers and acquisitions in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industry are critically important to the development and manufacturing of new treatments, the 51�Թ��� said at a House Judiciary Committee staff briefing Wednesday.

To incentivize innovation that helps patients and strengthens the American economy, U.S. antitrust policies must preserve M&A—a critical pathway for drug development.

What’s going on: The life sciences industry, and drug development in particular, is unique among sectors, as 90% of drugs that enter trials never get approved. M&A is a key avenue for biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies seeking to bring new treatments to patients, 51�Թ��� Managing Vice President of Policy Charles Crain, who moderated the discussion, told the audience.

M&A to the rescue: M&A activity—typically when one company acquires another—provides the financial resources and expertise needed to commercialize new drugs, according to a recent  co-authored by Dr. Anand Krishnamurthy, an economist and principal at Cornerstone Research and a panelist at the event.

• “We find that drug projects that undergo M&A have a higher likelihood of launching relative to drug products that do not,” the study reads, in part.
• During the briefing, representatives from Life Sciences Pennsylvania and BioNJ recounted how larger companies have helped life sciences startups in their states obtain regulatory approval and deliver novel treatments to patients.

Why they work: Early-stage life sciences firms frequently depend on outside investment to bring new drugs through the lengthy clinical stage process, Crain said.

• “M&A acts as an anticipated exit point for investors in these startups and is critical to attracting this funding,” he said, adding that it also “allows the companies to more freely pursue groundbreaking therapeutic innovation.”

Without M&A in life sciences: Policies that hamstring this crucial funding mechanism in the life sciences could derail innovation, potentially damaging people’s health and costing lives down the line. For the life sciences industry, that is simply too high of a price.

������ in Iowa, the future of manufacturing is taking shape today. The Quest for the Crystal of Innovation (also known as the Innovators Quest)—a gamified experience that introduces students to modern manufacturing careers—is engaging students in hands-on challenges in robotics, circuitry and teamwork.

In an age where classrooms increasingly rely on digital learning, this active, physical experience helped some students uncover new strengths and interests—potentially leading to careers that will last a lifetime.

The quest: Developed by the Manufacturing Institute, the 51�Թ���’s workforce development and education affiliate, thanks to a grant from American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Innovators Quest is made up of four “realms” laid out in a board game format.

• These realms include hands-on building challenges that introduce students to core manufacturing skills, like problem-solving, teamwork and communication.
• As they seek to recover the “Crystal of Innovation,” students in grades 4 through 9 try their hands at 3D printing, robotics and other cutting-edge manufacturing concepts.

Manufacturers’ involvement: Manufacturers, associations, workforce partners and community engagement groups can sponsor Innovators Quest kits, which they can use at schools, summer camps, local community events,  events, company family days and more.

• By facilitating the experience, manufacturers serve as the connector between Innovators Quest and real-world manufacturing.

The reception: “It’s been fun to see the ones who really light up,” said Kristen McMains, talent outreach specialist at Musco Lighting, who brought the experience to Oskaloosa’s classroom. “Teachers have told us, ‘That student doesn’t usually engage like this,’ and suddenly, they’re the one leading their group.”

• “I learned that I’m pretty good with wires and building stuff,” said Kolter Ozinga, an 8th grader who participated in the experience. “I like electrical work and teamwork.”

The big picture: Innovators Quest comes at a critical time for the manufacturing workforce. A 2024  by the MI and Deloitte projected that as many as 1.9 million manufacturing jobs could be left unfilled by 2033, when current 5th graders will be graduating high school. Today’s youth could be key to filling this talent gap—if they know the careers are out there.

• “Kids can’t be what they can’t see,” said MI President and Executive Director Carolyn Lee. “By sparking their interest in skills used in modern manufacturing, this student engagement activity illustrates the limitless possibilities of the many careers in our industry. The time to invest in our future workforce is now.”

Get involved: Interested in bringing Innovators Quest to your community? The MI is accepting orders for Innovators Quest kits through Jan. 31. .

The Bethesda, Maryland–based Centrus Energy Corp. will get an injection of $900 million from the Department of Energy to expand enrichment operations at its Ohio and Tennessee facilities ().

What’s going on: The U.S.-owned, U.S.-controlled uranium enrichment company announced earlier this month that it had been chosen by the DOE for a $900 million task order to build out its enrichment and centrifuge manufacturing capabilities at its facilities located in Piketon, Ohio, and Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

• “The competitively awarded funding will support a previously announced multibillion-dollar expansion that includes commercial-scale production of High-Assay, Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU), a critical fuel for next-generation nuclear reactors, alongside additional production of conventional low-enriched uranium (LEU) for the existing reactor fleet.”
• Centrus has already begun adding to its workforce in anticipation of the project, which is forecast to create about 1,000 construction jobs and 300 permanent jobs in Ohio and hundreds of new direct jobs in Tennessee.

Why it’s important: There is growing bipartisan support to shore up domestic uranium enrichment to power nuclear reactors.

• Russia remains a dominant global supplier of enrichment capacity, particularly for HALEU, which has become a strategic vulnerability as advanced reactor projects move closer to deployment.

51�Թ��� involvement: The 51�Թ��� is one of the foremost advocates for strengthening nuclear power in the U.S. Last year, the 51�Թ���  Energy Secretary Chris Wright to allocate this funding to spur “the Department of Energy’s collaboration with the private sector to restore American leadership in producing nuclear fuel.” Timmons cited Centrus as an important example and urged further investment in the domestic nuclear supply chain.

The details: Under the DOE order, Centrus will install additional centrifuge cascades to increase HALEU output and produce LEU feedstock for those cascades, as well as expand LEU volumes for commercial utilities and support national security mandates.

• The first of the new capacity will come in 2029, the company said.
• In addition to the $900 million, the task order includes possible funding, at the DOE’s discretion, of up to $170 million for HALEU production and delivery, bringing the total potential value to about $1.07 billion.

The 51�Թ��� says: “Increasing domestic supplies of nuclear fuel will help the U.S. boost its output of nuclear power, which is crucial for manufacturers to continue to access stable, clean and abundant baseload power in the U.S.,” said 51�Թ��� Director of Energy and Resources Policy Michael Davin.

• “Domestic sources of nuclear fuel and secure supply chains will also allow the U.S. to avoid relying on foreign adversaries to fuel its nuclear fleet.”

In a recent  published by the University of Delaware’s Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance and supported by the 51�Թ���, public companies—including many 51�Թ��� members—voiced concern about the politicization of the shareholder proposal process.

• They also exppessed support for updating the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules to tighten minimum ownership requirements and the support thresholds for resubmitted proposals.

The findings: Overall, company representatives indicated dissatisfaction with the misuse of the proposal process, with 79% of respondents agreeing that proposals are primarily used to promote activists’ political and social views.

• Public companies reported that they incur significant costs, primarily on outside counsel fees, in responding to shareholder proposals.
• A majority of corporate respondents said they spend more than $100,000 each year, about 25% said they spend at least $500,000, and 11% reported that they spend more than $1 million.

The fixes: Sixty-one percent of respondents supported replacing the current $2,000 minimum ownership threshold for long-term investors with a percentage requirement (such as 1% or more of a company’s outstanding shares), while 41% called for increasing the minimum dollar stake to $1 million or more.

• Almost 86% of company representatives favored increasing the minimum support levels required for shareholders to resubmit the same proposal in subsequent years. Respondents supported requirements of 10% (after year one), 20% (after year two) and 40% (after year three). The current thresholds are 5%, 15% and 25%, respectively.

Why it’s important: The SEC is considering proposing new rules to govern the shareholder proposal process. The 51�Թ��� has submitted  to the SEC to address the politicization of the proposal process and to reduce costs for manufacturers.

• “The responses to the Weinberg Center survey indicate that reforms are needed to improve the proposal process, which has been hijacked by professional shareholder proponents that seek to force companies to act according to their own narrow interests rather than to promote long-term investor returns,” said 51�Թ��� Senior Director of Corporate Finance Policy Ted Allen.

Artificial intelligence, the manufacturing labor shortage, training programs and more—all were covered in a recent episode of the “Workforce 4.0” podcast, featuring Manufacturing Institute President and Executive Director Carolyn Lee.

What’s going on: Among the first topics addressed by Lee last week when she chatted with podcast host Ann Wyatt for the episode “” was the still-persistent concern that AI will “take” jobs from human workers.

• “[W]hen you ask the average manufacturer, especially a large manufacturer, they would say they’ve been working with robotics and automation for many years now,” Lee told Wyatt. “This is not new. … Large language models and generative AI [are] new … but … manufacturers have [always] been at the forefront of technology evolution and innovation, and it has not eliminated all people. I see people wherever I go.”
• In fact, the more widespread automation and other AI applications have become, the more appealing some of the work has become. Lee told the story of a manufacturing worker nearing retirement age who told her, “I’ve been in this sector for 40 years. I’m 65. I want to stay longer because the job is safer. It’s interesting, I’m learning more in the last five years than I’ve learned my entire previous career, and I’m excited for what’s to come.”
• Manufacturers just need to train their workforces on the technology so their teams “are able to evolve” with it.

Humans in demand: Human workers are still very much in demand. In fact, the manufacturing industry still has a dearth of about 400,000 workers—a shortfall that, if current trends continue, will grow to 1.9 million by 2033, Lee said, citing data from a joint MI–Deloitte 2024  .

• “When we do this updated paper, which will be in ’27, I think it will show a much bigger number because our retirements will have continued … [and] all this domestic investment is going to create new jobs,” she went on. That, coupled with the advancement of AI, will make workforce training—the kind the MI does—and worker upskilling even more important.

�󴡲ѷ�-�dzܲ������������ܳ�������:��Lee and Wyatt discussed the Federation for Advanced Manufacturing Education (FAME), a national apprenticeship-style training program started in 2010 by Toyota and now run entirely by the MI.

• FAME now has “over 42 chapters in 17 states, training thousands of students in maintenance for an [Advanced Manufacturing Technician] degree,” according to Lee.
• “It is really an employer-led model where the employers are driving that commitment, driving the training, working in concert with community colleges and then local business entities to help support that network,” she said. “And then you’re growing the pool of talent and you’re building practices to solve this together so that we’re not fighting over a shrinking pool; we’re actually growing that pool.”

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has issued multiple warnings urging consumers to immediately stop using certain imported mattresses that fail mandatory federal flammability standards. The alerts follow a pattern of recent recalls targeting noncompliant products that pose a risk of serious injury or death from fire.

What’s going on: The CPSC recently  consumers to stop using Crayan mattresses after finding they violated the federal flammability rule, citing a serious fire hazard. The Chinese firm has been uncooperative in the implementation of a June 2025 recall.

• The warning builds on similar  last fall involving Elitespace mattresses, after the noncompliant seller, Foshanshiyiliangjiajukejiyouxiangongsi, of China, doing business as Elitespace Home, failed to recall their product or offer a remedy to consumers.

Dangerous competition: Noncompliant imports undercut responsible manufacturers by avoiding safety requirements, endangering American consumers. Allowing these unsafe products to stay on the market creates dangerous competition, rewarding copycats who cut corners while exposing families to preventable fire risks.

• These recalls demonstrate how appropriate enforcement can help level the playing field and keep consumers safe.

The 51�Թ��� says: “Manufacturers are committed to keeping American families safe,” said 51�Թ��� Vice President of Domestic Policy Jake Kuhns. “CPSC oversight of noncompliant products is vital to protecting families and the manufacturers that play by the rules.”

In October, the S&P Cotality Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price NSA Index recorded a 1.4% annual gain, up slightly from 1.3% in September. The 10-City Composite saw an annual increase of 1.9%, down from 2.0% the previous month, while the 20-City Composite rose 1.3% year-over-year, down from 1.4%. Among the 20 cities, Chicago posted the highest annual gain at 5.8%, followed by New York at 5.0% and Cleveland at 4.1%. Tampa again recorded the lowest annual return, with prices falling 4.2%.

On a month-over-month basis, the U.S. National Index ticked down 0.2% before seasonal adjustment. At the same time, the 10-City and 20-City Composites both decreased in October, declining 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively.

High mortgage rates and inflation have begun to overwhelm home price resilience as affordability has slowed demand. Before seasonal adjustment, 16 of the 20 cities saw prices drop in October. The Midwest and Northeast markets continue to sustain growth as broader conditions across the country soften. Meanwhile, in addition to Tampa, the Sun Belt continued declining, including Phoenix (down 1.5%), Dallas (down 1.5%) and Miami (down 1.1%).

Following the weakest growth in more than two years in September, a new equilibrium has emerged within the housing market. Short-term momentum has stalled, and persistent affordability challenges have resulted in minimal price appreciation and declines in some regions.

In December, Texas factory activity contracted after rising the prior month. The production index plummeted 23.7 points to -3.2, dropping below the series average of 9.6. Furthermore, most other measures declined notably from November. The new orders index decreased 11.2 points to -6.4. Capacity utilization moved down 23.9 points to -4.5, while shipments plunged 25.7 points to -10.6.

Perceptions of manufacturing business conditions remained negative in December, with the general business conditions index inching down 0.5 points to -10.9. At the same time, the outlook worsened, with the company outlook index falling 5.6 points to -11.9. The uncertainty index weakened 15.7 points to 0, remaining far below the series average of 17.

Labor market indicators suggest a decline in both headcounts and the workweek in December, with the employment index stepping down 2.3 points to -1.1 and the hours worked index falling 17.4 points to -7.5. More than 13% of firms reported net layoffs, while a smaller percentage (12.3%) noted net hiring.

Price pressures were little changed, but wage pressures accelerated in December. The prices paid for raw materials index stepped up 0.7 points to 36. Meanwhile, the prices received for finished goods index decreased 2.6 points to 8.2. The wages and benefits index rose 6.4 points to 21.8, moving above the series average of 21.

The outlook for future manufacturing activity remained positive in December, with the future production index edging up 0.5 points to 34.2. Meanwhile, the future general business activity index ticked down 0.2 points to 10.8, while the future company outlook index inched up 0.3 points to 16.5.