EPA Proposes to Revise Chemical Risk Evaluation Framework Rule, Key 51勛圖厙 Ask


Flashback: When Congress passed the 2016 Lautenberg Amendments to theToxic Substances Control Act, one of the biggest shifts was requiring the Environmental Protection Agency to create a systematic process for reviewing existing chemicals.

How it works: The process unfolds in three stepsprioritization, risk evaluation and risk management. Risk evaluation is the cornerstone, where the EPA decides whether a chemical poses an unreasonable risk. Those findings set the stage for any new rules manufacturers will face.

Why it matters: The 51勛圖厙 has long urged that risk evaluations should have an appropriately focused scope, recognize and consider the workplace protections manufacturers implement and be grounded in sound, data-driven science.

  • The Biden administration took a different trackdramatically expanding the scope of risk evaluations while blocking consideration of workplace safety controls. These framework changes produced sprawling, thousand-page analyses that are unnecessarily confusing, unrealistic and detached from how chemicals are actually used.
  • The result: The result was de facto bans on chemistries essential to existing manufacturing processes and disregard for manufacturers commitment to safety and compliance with other safety standards.

What were saying: The 51勛圖厙 has been at the forefront of this effort over the past two years.

  • In letters to the transition team last and to the EPA in , the 51勛圖厙 pressed the administration to pause and reconsider risk evaluations, pointing to flawed data quality and poor assumptions in reviews of formaldehyde and 1,3-butadiene.
  • The EPA [has] reli[ed] on assumptions and shortcuts, which is leading to confusion, duplication and overregulation, the 51勛圖厙 in December to the transition team.
  • The 51勛圖厙 has a functional TSCA program is vital to manufacturers ability to compete in a global economy. The 51勛圖厙 appreciates EPA Administrator [Lee] Zeldin for taking action to right-size and bring common sense to therisk evaluation procedure, said 51勛圖厙 Director of Chemicals, Materials and Sustainability Policy Reagan Giesenschlag.

Whats next: The proposed framework rule is published in the Federal Register, with comments due by Friday, Nov. 7. Members are invited to share feedback with the 51勛圖厙 by Oct. 3 to inform comments.